Let's Talk About How Christianity Is Not Repressed

(Note 24 August 2015: Fixed a sentence.)

It's often said that Christianity is not repressed, even in today's society. Isn't it? If statistics are to be believed, over 1/7 of the world belongs to the Christian faith. The problem is, a lot of this isn't true Christianity, but rather people believing in God, but choosing to stay in their sin, or adopting beliefs that are non-Christian. Outside influences often shape people's faith, and many have no problem going against the teachings of God and Jesus and adopting views that the world teaches. Some say, "How can those people do that? Stand against the world, and lean on God." I agree with that sentiment, but in those people's defense, it can be pretty hard to do in a world like this one!

Let's take a recent news article. You could do this with the entire media, from TV shows, to articles, to movies, to video games, to music, but this one specific article highlights basically everything repressing about this world. News articles are meant to be neutral regarding information, correct? I'm not saying they need to favor Christianity, only that they do not unfairly slander it. The Huffington Post recently, however, did just that.

Keeping in mind Fair Use, let's discuss the subtle, yet glaring, bias on display in the article.

Louie Gohmert used an equation to prove that there is a creator.

 Gohmert did not elaborate on how he leapt from something to nothing to everything to the "Lord we know" rather than to, say, a Flying Spaghetti Monster.

That's true. The equation doesn't prove Christianity specifically, only that there is a creator. Still, that proves that there is a creator, a point which is ignored for the rest of the article. This is pretty significant news, guys. For such a significant discovery, it's not getting much note. Also, take careful note here that he didn't just reach that conclusion, he leapt to it, like a whimsical child leaping through the meadows. Wording like this is prominent in subtly-discrediting media outlets like this.

Gohmert also neglected to explain who would have created the Lord he knows, or whether the Lord created Himself before He existed.

 The Lord he knows. Some will say that that wording is the Huffington Post avoiding religious bias, but in fact, the tone here is quite mocking. The mention of the flying spaghetti monster in the first quote does the same thing; showing a neutral viewpoint, but suggesting a mocking one.

After this, the last three entire paragraphs (almost half of the article) are spent on a completely unrelated note, discussing him yelling at somebody over beliefs not related to the equation at hand. Even in the unrelated parts, they manage to mock him:

. . . the tea party conservative asked Lynn, who disagreed with Gohmert’s narrow perception of Hell. 

The Tea Party is not popular in the general public, nor is conservatism in general, so it's only  natural that associating him with those things would make him seem less appealing. They also point out his narrow  perception of Hell. The narrow-minded Tea Party nutjob conservative with imaginary spaghetti monster friends made a claim, then went on a yelling spree about the eternal punishment nonsense again.

This is what the article is actually saying. No, I am not paranoid. Messages like this are in plain sight all over the media. Yet the existence of a creator has basically been proven with something as simple and worldly as math. Nothing plus nothing does not equal everything. Instead, a news outlet meant to be neutral spent the entire time reporting on this fact to mock Christianity.

By the way, I know some will see this and think, "Who cares who mocks Christianity? It's a nonsense belief anyway!" Those people should care deeply about this. If it's wrong to be biased against Atheism, it also is wrong to be biased against Christianity. This is one of the basic tenets of human compassion (not to mention the will of God), that true information should be spread, it should be done fairly, and that nobody should be unfairly mocked in the process, and it is happening to your fellow man. A creator may have been proven a few days ago, and the media is trying to hide this fact with mocking undertones. Remember, just because a fact favors Christianity, does not mean that it should automatically be discredited.

May God bless you all with objective truth, including Christians who are being misled by today's media, so that the world's bias may fall from you like water, dropping from your mind and heart, to the ground, and disappearing from you in the warmth of light. Amen.

Something I wrote earlier.

This Earth is a test, a battlefield, for all living beings.

We were not designed as perfect beings, and after eating the forbidden fruit, we only fell further. Our inherent proclivities render us imperfect, so we are put into an imperfect world.

Why does God allow us to suffer? Because we were designed to be imperfect, but being exposed to objective perfection we are granted free will, giving us the choice to cling to our imperfections or to seek something greater.

Suffering allows us to grow, to mature, to learn, and to appreciate the good. While balance exists, it is important to align yourself with positivity, so that your influence and consequent influences will be positive. It is this positivity with the false and evil that create the battlefield on this planet.

There are many strategies for fighting, but the only winning one is positivity as defined by God. All others are flawed and cause unnecessary suffering, even on an earthly level.

In aligning yourself with positivity, you are preparing yourself for the next world. If you align yourself with this world [meaning, Earth], you will not be ready or fitting for Heaven. Many, many chances are being given to man to change, and to adopt the ways of the place they are going, rather than the place where they are.

Salvation is not simply outward changes; it is a complete transformation of self into a being preparing for Heaven and seeing beyond the ways of Earth. One day, you will leave the battlefield and return home. But where is your home going to be when you lay down your gun?

Intellect

(Note 24 August 2015: This post has been edited a bit.) 

Intellect is actually a very subjective thing in the human eye. This society, just like all societies, has preconceived notions of what is worth knowing and what isn't worth knowing, and it's generally held that knowing the right things is what makes one an "intellectual". Somebody understands street drugs just as another understands mathematics, both knowing the same of both, yet the one who understands math more is the one that's declared an "intellectual". But isn't the drug user an intellectual as well? "Everybody is a genius, but if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will spend its whole life believing that it is stupid." (Einstein) A mind is trained to believe that certain things are more worthy than others in knowledge. In this society, it's mostly mathematics and science.

The problem is that in this worldview alone, intellect is completely subjective, because all it means is an understanding of something. Following the idea of Creationism, morality and the resulting intellectual ties are made objective through the higher power (God, father of Jesus) defining the truth of this realm, like a video game designer deciding what powers each player's character should have. That's what makes intellect objective - showing us that intellect involves things like love, rather than math; compassion, rather than observation; and so on. However, that's why I said "through the human eye" earlier. Not everybody is going to want to adhere to that worldview, and so, socially speaking, intellect is still undefined. Is math important, since one is forced to learn it for so long in schools? Is it only important because they make it important? Is science important? The physical plane will mean absolutely nothing to you the second you die. Science, as it stands, refuses to accept anything non-physical, and so it stands idly by in empirical evidence. Is knowledge of where to get some drugs important? They will only serve to mess with your mind. Do you want your mind tampered with? Understanding anything will make you an intellectual, but do you know anything worth knowing?

Without adhering to an objective morality, you will never know.

And since that option is there, intellect is basically the most dangerous weapon mankind has, since it has no actual definable form in the eye of many of its own users. Some intellect can help us, and some intellect can hurt us. Information can be used for good or bad, depending on what that information is, and how you wield it, like water. It can be drank and used for nourishment, or it can be shot off at a high speed haphazardly, and can be used to sting somebody. It's possible to swim through it, and enjoy it on a warm summer's day, or you can drown in it, with it surrounding you, overwhelming you, too much of it being there for you to handle. Intellect is a very powerful weapon which those who do understand its inherent objectivity (Christians) must wield with much care, and a weapon which those who don't (secularists, occultists, etc), must take much time and care to learn.

-- NOCTURNAL IRIDESCENCE

Random Thoughts

(Note 24 August 2015: I removed a lot of the text here. What little is left, is what I still agree with today.)

I used to do this every now and then when my writing was still done on a physical medium (some of which I plan to transfer here some day), and I decided to do it here, too. Each paragraph is a thought that I feel explains itself without needing to become a full post. I hope everybody who read this gets something good out of them.

Black metal fans seem to love artists who do what they want without thinking about what the fans want or expect, but when God does something that does not fit their desires, even if it ends up being for the best, they throw fits. Is anyone else seeing something wrong there? And no, it is not only because the music sounds good. The whole general attitude is highly praised.

People are so attached to material possessions, and they don't want to give them up. But whether you believe in an afterlife or not (that afterlife is still real! - August 2015), you know for a fact that you are going to lose those possessions one day. There will be a time when people are not going to have these material possessions. Life is going to be different, and people need to be prepared for that. Even if you don't just out and get rid of everything you own (as that can be a very long and tiring process, depending on how much people want your stuff), how prepared are you to get rid of it if the occasion arises? Are you prepared to do that?

Isn't it a bit funny how a lot of people don't take ramblings like this seriously, but they watch news stations religiously?



- NOCTURNAL IRIDESCENCE

         

Interested in Space, or Science?

(Note 24 August 2015: This post has been edited. It's one of a few old posts that doesn't really warrant deletion, but I edited it a bit anyway.)

Let's get something straight: having an interest in science is not the same thing as having an interest in space. Liking rocket ships and running experiments on the moon does not mean that you are interested in the subject of space. A lot of people compare science to "discovery" as though conducting experiments in a room were ever "discovery". There is a lot to discover in space, but you don't learn about it by studying the effects of gravity in it, or how far manmade machines would need to go in manmade numbers to reach something, you learn about it by observing how vast it is firsthand, by observing the planets that have the systems of gravity, rather than studying how that gravity works. The workings of this world are nothing compared to the beauty of the world itself; if you study its behavior, you never see the beauty in all of it. Space is an infinite void, full of stars and planets, nebulae and solar systems, magellanic clouds and black holes, moons and landscapes, and a whole bunch of gravityless wonder in between. You could either observe that beauty and realize what a gift it is, or you could just scrutinize it, and ask questions about how such-and-such a moon was formed, or why it does what it does. It's knowledge, but it's useless knowledge.

If you want knowledge that space has to offer, stand out on a clear night under the night sky. Sit in the grass, and look up at it. Feel the air blowing on you. Take a telescope if you like. You don't need to make a starchart with the telescope, it's just a corrective lens for your eyes that can't see that far.

The beauty of space goes way beyond any science lab, or its understanding. Anybody who desires something more than what they can find in a classroom can at least get a foretaste of it in the night sky; it's not everything, but it's something. Science can never capture true wonder in a jar, or study it on a lab table; science can never capture the real beauty of space. It can create tools that help us to see it better, but its manner of scrutiny and mundane examination does not begin to do justice to the wonder of outer space.

A lot of people see that beauty, and then hear that our physical bodies were made from it, and are amazed, as though it were completely irregular. That's still getting away from the main point; it doesn't matter how it happens or why it happens. The point is that it happens, and it's something to behold, not something to scrutinize. That's missing the entire point of it. Realizing that is what it means to have an interest in space. It's what real discovery is. (Note 24 August 2015: I'm a Young Earth Creationist, so I don't agree that we are made from star matter anyway.)

Understanding space is a very non-scientific concept. Do not confuse a passion for one with a passion for the other.

- NOCTURNAL IRIDESCENCE

Remember to always protest movements to put garbage in outer space. 

Modern Gaming

Something seems different about video games today. I was once a fairly avid gamer, but then I got away from it for several years, got back into it, and now I am usually very indifferent to video games. The last one to come into my possession came out in 2008, and my dedication to gaming shows that. I've completely missed the releases of the PS3 and all of the X-boxes, the thin PS2s, the DS, and many, many more systems, but today, I was playing some video games with my friend at his house, and those games just felt bland. Sure, the elements of fantasy were there, advanced technology, new landscapes, bosses that you would be quite stunned to find on the streets, and more, and all of these elements were present in the video games I liked as a child, but something... something was still missing.

The most socially acceptable way I could describe it is a lack of magic. The games I remember playing tickled the imagination, inspired the mind, and really expanded around you as you played, which only increased the effects of the first 2. The games I played today, like Resident Evil 6 and Knights Contract, were more like walking around with a giant wallet that had no money in it, or unscented perfume that came in a fancy bottle and shiny label; there was something there, but the effects of owning it that you'd expect weren't there. With games like this, and all of the (presumably) unreal things happening in them, you'd probably expect the magical effects of seeing those unreal things to carry over into your experience, but no matter how many lights flew out of people's hands and no matter how many giant monsters there were and no matter how many special effects there were with the graphics, none of that magic was there. Magic doesn't have to mean that kind of magic you see in kids' cartoons, either. Magic in that sense like wonder and amazement at previously un-thought-of concepts, can apply at any age and style; it was completely absent though.

My problem with that is that while all video games are basically escapism, there are games with benefits that can come from that escapism. An example is Spyro. Regardless of what age I was when I played those games, they always expanded my imaginative horizons, which is very important to me since I'm an artist. Games today, though don't carry that with them as I explained above. Therefore, there is little healthiness coming from that escapism. This is happening at a time when video games are becoming more popular, and are influencing the minds of more people. I don't care if GTA is making people violent or not, video games do indeed influence the minds of players, and games with that dryness to them can't be good for impressionable people.

This is just something I needed to get out. Think about it before you spend another 6 hours on whatever modern system you use.

Wasn't listening to anything as I wrote this
- NOCTURNAL IRIDESCENCE